For further information on his life and complete works, see CLC, Volumes 1, 2, 6, 10, and Structured as a modern tragedy, the play depicts the last twenty-four hours in the life of Willy Loman, a sixty-three-year-old traveling salesman, who for thirty-six years has sold his wares all over New England. The eldest son, Biff, a former high school football star, has travelled the country holding a series of aimless jobs.
But Miller did not feel this was the case, politically he had strong socialistic principles so he was critical of capitalism. This belief lies behind the meaning of the play for its didactic purpose was to show how capitalism is destructive to humanity.
I believe these props help the audience to visualise these deeper meanings and that it is a very effective technique. But as the play unfolds we learn that Joe is responsible for the death of twenty one pilots and yet we as an audience still do not perceive Joe as an evil character.
Although we learn of the horrific crime Joe has committed, the audience still sympathise with him, this is because Joe does not realise the extent of his actions, Joe also does not have the ability to see the importance of anything else but his business. The audience also sympathises with Joe because he did it genuinely for his family.
Despite the fact that we sympathise with Joe Keller, Miller shows us that how wrong Joe is, he highlights the fact that Joe knew the risk of sending out cracked cylinder heads and the fact that Joe lets another man take the blame for his crime also shoes Joe in a very bad light.
Miller cleverly does this so that the audience cannot out rightly condemn Joe. I believe that by committing suicide Joe was again relieving himself of more pain and guilt and only upon hearing that Larry killed himself because of his actions, does Joe kill himself which makes me believe that his mind was still thinking about his family and not all the other men he had killed.
The fact that Joe involved Kate in his lies makes me dislike him because not only is he lying about his act but also bringing someone else into his mess. Miller captured the contrast in sacrifice and profit perfectly but also showed the audience that the people who did profit from the war did not always do so maliciously, that in itself, is a success.Luckily for Miller and for the American stage, All My Sons was a success.
Opening at the Coronet Theatre on January 29, , the first night's notices were mixed--with the crucial exception of the New York Times, whose Brooks Atkinson admired Miller as a genuine new talent.
Buy Understanding Arthur Miller's All My Sons: GCSE Study Guide for Summer iGCSE Students by Gavin Smithers, Gill Chilton (ISBN: ) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders/5. Arthur Miller’s “All My Sons”, is a tale of the contrast between human profit and human loss in the midst of World War II.
The play was written during the war, but Miller set the play some two years after the war, in August of in Midwest suburban America, with the main plot set [ ]. Arthur Miller”s All My Sons Essay.
Arthur Miller”s All My Sons is a perfect example of a literary work that builds up to, and then reaches, an ending that simultaneously satisfies the reader”s expectations and brings all the play”s themes to a dramatic conclusion.
How It All Goes Down Joe Keller, a successful businessman, lives comfortably with his wife, Kate, and son, Chris, in a suburban American neighborhood. They have only one sadness in their lives – the loss of their other son, Larry, who went missing in World War II.
All My Sons is one of Miller’s earliest plays to explore what has become one of the playwright’s major thematic concerns: the tragic destruction of the common man. Miller’s reputation as one.